Remember when Activision tried to buy Rare and lost? Well, the plot twist nobody saw coming just happened.
Xbox has announced that Rare is now being overseen by Activision as part of its latest reshuffling. Yes, the same Activision that reportedly lost a bidding war to acquire the studio over 20 years ago. Now, instead of owning Rare outright, Activision is overseeing it under the Xbox umbrella.
For those who need a quick history lesson: Rare was a legendary studio behind classics like Banjo-Kazooie and Perfect Dark. Over two decades ago, Microsoft ended up acquiring Rare instead of Activision, which reportedly had been in the running. That decision shaped Rare's future for years, and now the tables have turned in a very unexpected way.
This move is part of a broader reshuffling at Xbox, which has been reorganizing its studios and leadership. Rare joining Activision's oversight doesn't mean Activision bought the studio outright this time. Instead, it's an internal restructuring where Activision takes on a supervisory role. The exact details of what this means for Rare's day-to-day operations haven't been fully spelled out yet.
So what does this mean for you as a player? If you're a Rare fan, you're probably wondering about the future of games like Sea of Thieves and whatever else the studio has cooking. For now, it's business as usual in terms of announcements, but the oversight change could influence priorities down the line.
It's a strange full-circle moment for the industry. Activision once wanted Rare badly enough to fight for it. Now, decades later, it's guiding the studio's direction under the same corporate roof. Whether that's good or bad depends on how you feel about Activision's track record with its own studios.
We'll have to wait and see what this shake-up actually delivers. In the meantime, it's a wild reminder that in gaming, history has a way of looping back around.
What do you think about Rare now being overseen by Activision? Will this change how you feel about the studio's future games?
Comments (0)
Log in to join the discussion
Log InNo comments yet